From: PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
To: Karl Wright <kwright@metacarta.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 08:42:51 +0200
Message-ID: <op.tt5oxpopcigqcu@apollo13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4676DD57.7070304@metacarta.com>
References: <4676DD57.7070304@metacarta.com>
> Question: Does anyone have any idea what bottleneck I am hitting? An
> index's performance should in theory scale as the log of the number of
> rows - what am I missing here?
These can help people on the list to help you :
- Your hardware config (CPU, RAM, disk) ?
- EXPLAIN ANALYZE from slow queries ?
- VACUUM and ANALYZE : yes ? how often ?
- VACUUM VERBOSE output
for huge bits of text with long line length, mail sucks, upload to a web
host or something.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: lists@peufeu.com, kwright@metacarta.com
Subject: Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access
In-Reply-To: <op.tt5oxpopcigqcu@apollo13>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox