From: PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
To: Thomas Andrews <tandrews@soliantconsulting.com>
To: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Mark Lewis <mark.lewis@mir3.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Thousands of tables versus on table?
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:21:18 +0200
Message-ID: <op.tteytsyycigqcu@apollo13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C289E6F5.A74%tandrews@soliantconsulting.com>
References: <C289E6F5.A74%tandrews@soliantconsulting.com>
> can tell you our vacuum every night is taking 2 hours and that disk IO is
> the real killer - the CPU rarely gets higher than 20% or so.
How many gigabytes of stuff do you have in this database ?
( du -sh on the *right* directory will suffice, don't include the logs
etc, aim for data/base/oid)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: lists@peufeu.com, tandrews@soliantconsulting.com, stark@enterprisedb.com, mark.lewis@mir3.com
Subject: Re: Thousands of tables versus on table?
In-Reply-To: <op.tteytsyycigqcu@apollo13>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox