From: PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
To: Frank van Vugt <ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: plan difference between set-returning function with ROWS within IN() and a plain join
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 11:53:17 +0200
Message-ID: <op.uap8e3owcigqcu@apollo13.peufeu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200805061021.43448.ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl>
References: <200805061021.43448.ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl>
On Tue, 06 May 2008 10:21:43 +0200, Frank van Vugt <ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl>
wrote:
> L.S.
>
> I'm noticing a difference in planning between a join and an in() clause,
> before trying to create an independent test-case, I'd like to know if
> there's
> an obvious reason why this would be happening:
Is the function STABLE ?
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: lists@peufeu.com, ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl
Subject: Re: plan difference between set-returning function with ROWS within IN() and a plain join
In-Reply-To: <op.uap8e3owcigqcu@apollo13.peufeu.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox