pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre C <lists@peufeu.com>
To: Joachim Worringen <joachim.worringen@iathh.de>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:03:42 +0200
Message-ID: <op.vdn3kgtheorkce@immo.peufeu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BFFA32D.8010009@iathh.de>
References: <4BFB837C.6010005@iathh.de>
	<AANLkTik4_exB6U3GlfLMNIgPSk0G3RVQ8fWBTzwekrke@mail.gmail.com>
	<4BFB91A8.20805@iathh.de>
	<201005251241.59605.andres@anarazel.de>
	<4BFD4643.9010901@iathh.de>
	<4BFFA32D.8010009@iathh.de>


> As promised, I did a tiny benchmark - basically, 8 empty tables are  
> filled with 100k rows each within 8 transactions (somewhat typically for  
> my application). The test machine has 4 cores, 64G RAM and RAID1 10k  
> drives for data.
>
> # INSERTs into a TEMPORARY table:
> [joachim@testsrv scaling]$ time pb query -d scaling_qry_1.xml
>
> real    3m18.242s
> user    1m59.074s
> sys     1m51.001s
>
> # INSERTs into a standard table:
> [joachim@testsrv scaling]$ time pb query -d scaling_qry_1.xml
>
> real    3m35.090s
> user    2m5.295s
> sys     2m2.307s
>
> Thus, there is a slight hit of about 10% (which may even be within  
> meausrement variations) - your milage will vary.

Usually WAL causes a much larger performance hit than this.

Since the following command :

CREATE TABLE tmp AS SELECT n FROM generate_series(1,1000000) AS n

which inserts 1M rows takes 1.6 seconds on my desktop, your 800k rows  
INSERT taking more than 3 minutes is a bit suspicious unless :

- you got huge fields that need TOASTing ; in this case TOAST compression  
will eat a lot of CPU and you're benchmarking TOAST, not the rest of the  
system
- you got some non-indexed foreign key
- some other reason ?



view thread (15+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <op.vdn3kgtheorkce@immo.peufeu.com>
Permalink:  ../op.vdn3kgtheorkce@immo.peufeu.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/op.vdn3kgtheorkce@immo.peufeu.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: lists@peufeu.com, joachim.worringen@iathh.de
  Subject: Re: performance of temporary vs. regular tables
  In-Reply-To: <op.vdn3kgtheorkce@immo.peufeu.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox