From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Any experience using "shake" defragmenter?
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:31:26 -0600
Message-ID: <op.vp44qo0134t2sn@me-pc.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D45C607.4070101@vmsinfo.com>
References: <4D45C607.4070101@vmsinfo.com>
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:11:51 -0600, Mladen Gogala
<mladen.gogala@vmsinfo.com> wrote:
> Did anyone try using "shake" while the cluster is active? Any problems
> with corruption or data loss? I ran the thing on my home directory and
> nothing was broken. I didn't develop any performance test, so cannot
> vouch for the effectiveness of the procedure. Did anyone play with that?
> Any positive or negative things to say about shake?
>
Why do you feel the need to defrag your *nix box?
Regards,
Mark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: feld@feld.me
Subject: Re: Any experience using "shake" defragmenter?
In-Reply-To: <op.vp44qo0134t2sn@me-pc.lan>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox