From: Harald Fuchs <hf0722x@protecting.net>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres --
Date: 14 Sep 2004 16:15:43 +0200
Message-ID: <pupt4phr74.fsf@srv.protecting.net> (raw)
References: <BF88DF69D9E2884B9BE5160DB2B97A85010D6D5F@nlshl-exch1.eu.uis.unisys.com>
In article <BF88DF69D9E2884B9BE5160DB2B97A85010D6D5F@nlshl-exch1.eu.uis.unisys.com>,
"Leeuw van der, Tim" <tim.leeuwvander@nl.unisys.com> writes:
> So what I can say is, that if you want fast INSERT performance from
> PostgreSQL then you'll probably have to do some trickery that you
> wouldn't have to do with a default MySQL installation.
I think the word "INSERT" is superfluous in the above sentence ;-)
Contrary to MySQL, you can't expect decent PostgreSQL performance on
decent hardware without some tuning.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: hf0722x@protecting.net
Subject: Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres --
In-Reply-To: <pupt4phr74.fsf@srv.protecting.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox