pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlad Arkhipov <arhipov@dc.baikal.ru>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Optimization idea
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:09:34 +0200
Message-ID: <q2ne94e14cd1004230609u9596f80ve2d126430be8cd86@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <y2y603c8f071004230405r5fcef546l3da84c407ce2655a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4BD0161A.4010908@dc.baikal.ru>
	<4BD0430C.1050308@2ndquadrant.com>
	<4BD10805.9060004@dc.baikal.ru>
	<y2y603c8f071004230405r5fcef546l3da84c407ce2655a@mail.gmail.com>

2010/4/23 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Vlad Arkhipov <arhipov@dc.baikal.ru> wrote:
>> I don't think this is just an issue with statistics, because the same
>> problem arises when I try executing a query like this:
>
> I'm not sure how you think this proves that it isn't a problem with
> statistics, but I think what you should be focusing on here, looking
> back to your original email, is that the plans that are actually much
> faster have almost as much estimated cost as the slower one.  Since
> all your data is probably fully cached, at a first cut, I might try
> setting random_page_cost and seq_page_cost to 0.005 or so, and
> adjusting effective_cache_size to something appropriate.

that will help worrect the situation, but the planner is loosing here I think.

>
> ...Robert
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>



-- 
Cédric Villemain



view thread (21+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <q2ne94e14cd1004230609u9596f80ve2d126430be8cd86@mail.gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../q2ne94e14cd1004230609u9596f80ve2d126430be8cd86@mail.gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/q2ne94e14cd1004230609u9596f80ve2d126430be8cd86@mail.gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, arhipov@dc.baikal.ru
  Subject: Re: Optimization idea
  In-Reply-To: <q2ne94e14cd1004230609u9596f80ve2d126430be8cd86@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox