pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: terry <94487509@qq.com>
To: pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: can we optimize STACK_DEPTH_SLOP
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:44:57 +0800
Message-ID: <tencent_4FE76787298AE38F6E28AF8B@qq.com> (raw)

Thanks for your help!
But why we set STACK_DEPTH_SLOP to 512K, not 128K?
What it according to?

view thread (4+ messages)

Message-ID: <tencent_4FE76787298AE38F6E28AF8B@qq.com>
Permalink:  ../tencent_4FE76787298AE38F6E28AF8B@qq.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/tencent_4FE76787298AE38F6E28AF8B@qq.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: 94487509@qq.com
  Subject: Re: can we optimize STACK_DEPTH_SLOP
  In-Reply-To: <tencent_4FE76787298AE38F6E28AF8B@qq.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox