From: terry <94487509@qq.com>
To: pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: can we optimize STACK_DEPTH_SLOP
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:44:57 +0800
Message-ID: <tencent_4FE76787298AE38F6E28AF8B@qq.com> (raw)
Thanks for your help!
But why we set STACK_DEPTH_SLOP to 512K, not 128K?
What it according to?
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: 94487509@qq.com
Subject: Re: can we optimize STACK_DEPTH_SLOP
In-Reply-To: <tencent_4FE76787298AE38F6E28AF8B@qq.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox