public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]>
To: M, Anbazhagan <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Clarification on Naming convention of the new recent packages #162
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 14:07:01 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR06MB6637E038DE9087619FBAF82CFF7DA@MN2PR06MB6637.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MN2PR06MB6637E038DE9087619FBAF82CFF7DA@MN2PR06MB6637.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Hi,
Aready replied you here:
https://github.com/pgdg-packaging/pgdg-rpms/issues/162
On Thu, 2026-03-05 at 04:13 +0000, M, Anbazhagan wrote:
> We noticed that all newly uploaded packages under the RHEL 8 repos
> like rhel-8.8/rhel-8.9/rhel-8.10 etc. contain 8.10 in the package
> name, regardless of the actual minor version of that repo.
>
> Could you confirm if this is intentional or if the package should
> reflect specific RHEL 8 minor version in their names?
>
> Example:
> https://download.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/15/redhat/rhel-8.9-x86_64/
> contains rpm named as [postgresql15-15.17-1PGDG.rhel8.10.x86_64.rpm]
>
> (
> https://download.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/15/redhat/rhel-8.9-x86_64
> /postgresql15-15.17-1PGDG.rhel8.10.x86_64.rpm)
>
>
> Anbazhagan M
> Staff Engineer, Technical Operations
> Instaclustr by Netapp
>
> NetApp
> +91-8056005329 Mobile Phone
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>
> [NetApp logo]<https://www.netapp.com/;
>
> [A white face with black eyes Description automatically
> generated]<https://netappdiscord.com/;[A black background with a black
> square Description automatically generated with medium
> confidence]<https://www.facebook.com/NetApp;[NetApp on
> Instagram]<https://www.instagram.com/netapp/;[NetApp on
> LinkedIn]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/netapp/;[NetApp on
> YouTube]<https://www.youtube.com/netapp;[NetApp on
> X]<https://twitter.com/NetApp;
--
Devrim Gündüz
Open Source Solution Architect, PostgreSQL Major Contributor
BlueSky: @devrim.gunduz.org , @gunduz.org
Attachments:
[application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (858B, 2-signature.asc)
download
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Clarification on Naming convention of the new recent packages #162
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox