From: Wei Weng <wweng@kencast.com>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: What is wrong with this identification configuration?
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 21:45:49 -0500
Message-ID: <001801c2d240$da1cb6d0$2f437242@PASCAL> (raw)
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302111825580.4868-100000@localhost.localdomain>
<20030212014524.GB5831@wolff.to>
<SNIP>
> The format of the hba.conf file changed between 7.1 and 7.2. It looks like
> you are using an old one. After the database field, there is now a user
> field. To get the same effect as before, use 'all' for the user.
I installed PostgreSQL rpm on a fresh installed Redhat 7.3. There is no
PostgreSQL 7.1 previously installed so I don't think the pg_hba.conf I was
editing is a left-over copy.
Specifically, which part of the configuration:
local all trust
host all 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 trust
is wrong and should be fixed accordingly?
Thanks
Wei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: wweng@kencast.com, bruno@wolff.to
Subject: Re: What is wrong with this identification configuration?
In-Reply-To: <001801c2d240$da1cb6d0$2f437242@PASCAL>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox