From: David Johnston <polobo@yahoo.com>
To: 'Samuel Gendler' <sgendler@ideasculptor.com>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: ambiguous local variable name in 9.0 proc
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 19:49:05 -0400
Message-ID: <00c301cc78b9$0ca38e30$25eaaa90$@yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEV0TzB5GDuaG=7OOv_7m6OWagAkkUmkeh=1a62E46o4wKdtgg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEV0TzB5GDuaG=7OOv_7m6OWagAkkUmkeh=1a62E46o4wKdtgg@mail.gmail.com>
From: pgsql-sql-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-sql-owner@postgresql.org]
On Behalf Of Samuel Gendler
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 7:35 PM
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: [SQL] ambiguous local variable name in 9.0 proc
I've got a stored proc (which worked fine in 8.3 and 8.4) that is declared
as such:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION reporting_mgmt.aggregate_timescales_impl (
div_start TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE,
tbl_schema VARCHAR,
tbl_root VARCHAR,
fine_timescale VARCHAR,
coarse_timescale VARCHAR,
coarser_timescale VARCHAR,
fact_fields VARCHAR,
dim_fields VARCHAR,
sum_fields VARCHAR)
RETURNS INTEGER
AS $$
Within that proc, I've got the following line:
IF EXISTS ( SELECT table_name FROM information_schema.tables
WHERE table_schema = tbl_schema
AND table_name = tbl_fine_part_old ) THEN
IF EXISTS ( SELECT status FROM reporting_mgmt.etl_status AS e
WHERE tbl_schema = e.tbl_schema
AND tbl_root = e.tbl_root
AND div_start_old = e.fine_time
AND coarse_timescale = e.coarse_scale
AND status = 0 ) THEN
And in 9.0, it is generating the following error:
ERROR: column reference "tbl_schema" is ambiguous
LINE 2: WHERE tbl_schema = e.tbl_schema
^
DETAIL: It could refer to either a PL/pgSQL variable or a table column.
QUERY: SELECT EXISTS ( SELECT status FROM reporting_mgmt.etl_status AS e
WHERE tbl_schema = e.tbl_schema
AND tbl_root = e.tbl_root
AND div_start_old = e.fine_time
AND coarse_timescale = e.coarse_scale
AND status = 0 )
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function "aggregate_timescales_impl" line 52 at IF
PL/pgSQL function "aggregate_timescales" line 23 at RETURN
Of course, it is true that tbl_schema could refer to the column in table
etl_status, except older versions of postgres seemed to correctly figure out
that comparing a column to itself isn't terribly useful, so it must be
referring to the pl/pgsql variable rather than the table column.
I'm happy to modify the proc definition, except that I am unsure how to do
so other than to rename the variable, which is my least favourite way to do
that. I'd far rather qualify the name somehow, so that it knows that I am
refering to a local variable, if at all possible. Suggestions?
Not tested but I think all local variables are implicitly scoped to the
function name so you should be able to do the following:
WHERE reporting_mgmt.aggregate_timescales_impl.tbl_schema = e.tbl_schema
You are going to have the same problem with other fields as well (e.g.,
tbl_root).
I believe there is some way to define the function so that it does not throw
that particular error; it would be up to you make sure that the ambiguity is
being resolved correctly (which it should in this particular case). Maybe
look for "SET" variables.
You could also copy the tbl_schema variable value into a different variable.
DECLARE tbl_schema_copy VARCHAR; tbl_schema_copy := tbl_schema;
. WHERE tbl_schema_copy = e.tbl_schema .
David J.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: polobo@yahoo.com, sgendler@ideasculptor.com
Subject: Re: ambiguous local variable name in 9.0 proc
In-Reply-To: <00c301cc78b9$0ca38e30$25eaaa90$@yahoo.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox