From: Tim Perdue, The Des Moines City.net <tim@dmcity.net>
To: pgsql-sql@hub.org
Subject: Re: Performance Question
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 16:33:05 -0600
Message-ID: <015601be5157$80192a10$0b8c5aa5@timnt.weather.net> (raw)
I did finally get most of the data dropped into the Postgres database. It's
now sitting at 55,000 email messages (100MB).
Even with a huge mix of records, search time is not impacted as far as I can
tell. Queries come back just as quickly as they did before.
I did discover that indexes on the text fields are not being used when I use
a Regex operator. So I dropped the index with no performance hit.
Thanks to everyone for their input,
Tim Perdue
geocrawler.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tim@dmcity.net, pgsql-sql@hub.org
Subject: Re: Performance Question
In-Reply-To: <015601be5157$80192a10$0b8c5aa5@timnt.weather.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox