pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Iain <iain@mst.co.jp>
To: Burr, Colin <CBurr@herald.com>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Bug: Sequence generator insert
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 12:08:56 +0900
Message-ID: <021001c3b7b8$75896570$7201a8c0@mst1x5r347kymb> (raw)
References: <7D8D2AE3E5A9DB4C8D78DE0F950ABB510BDC3F56@miaxch01.herald.com>

I just re-read your message, and it occurred to me that for the second
insert you may have provided an explicit value for the 'id', is that right?
You may need to give more detail about the inserts. I'd be mildly surprised,
but not concerned if the insert that failed used an explicit value for the
id (ir didn't use the default) but still used (and therefore incremented)
the sequence.

Regards
Iain
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Burr, Colin" <CBurr@herald.com>
To: <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:37 AM
Subject: [SQL] Bug: Sequence generator insert


> Dear Sir,
> I found a sequence generator software bug associated with duplicate key
> inserts that may be of interest to you.
>
> I first created a table with a primary key based on a sequence generator.
> The following script provides an example.
>
> CREATE SEQUENCE "id_seq" start 1 increment 1 maxvalue 2147483647 minvalue
1
> cache 1;
> REVOKE ALL on "id_seq" from PUBLIC;
> GRANT ALL on "id_seq" to "administrator";
>
> CREATE TABLE "example" (
>         "id" integer DEFAULT nextval('id_seq'::text) NOT NULL,
>         "colum_name" character varying(15) NOT NULL,
>         Constraint "ex_pkey" Primary Key ("id")
> );
> REVOKE ALL on "example" from PUBLIC;
> GRANT ALL on "example" to "administrator";
>
> When I tried to insert a record into the table where a duplicate record
> already exists, predictably, the insert fails and the following error is
> generated:
>
>           'ERROR:  Cannot insert a duplicate key into unique index
ex_pkey'
>
> However, even though the new record failed to be inserted into the table,
> the sequence generator was still updated.
>
> The sequence generator should only be updated if the record is
successfully
> inserted into the table, and should not be updated if the insert fails.
>
>
> Sincerely yours,
>
> Colin Burr
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings




view thread (4+ messages)

Message-ID: <021001c3b7b8$75896570$7201a8c0@mst1x5r347kymb>
Permalink:  ../021001c3b7b8$75896570$7201a8c0@mst1x5r347kymb/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/021001c3b7b8$75896570$7201a8c0@mst1x5r347kymb

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: iain@mst.co.jp, CBurr@herald.com
  Subject: Re: Bug: Sequence generator insert
  In-Reply-To: <021001c3b7b8$75896570$7201a8c0@mst1x5r347kymb>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox