From: Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon@thenilgiris.com>
To: D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: sql can i substitute
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 18:22:48 +0530
Message-ID: <0412171822481N.06834@thenilgiris.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041217074257.42a44460.darcy@druid.net>
References: <0412171655451H.06834@thenilgiris.com>
<20041217074257.42a44460.darcy@druid.net>
On Friday 17 December 2004 06:12 pm, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> An alternative to Andreas' suggestion would be to create a simple lookup
> table and join them. This is good if the real life example can get
> larger and/or the list can change and you don't want to modify code
> every time it does.
yes, but in this case the list wont change, and i'm trying to port mysql to
pgsql without disturbing as far as possible the mysql queries. basically
replacing some 'set' and 'enum' datatypes - one table has six of thes, and
adding six tables is not on
kg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: lawgon@thenilgiris.com, darcy@druid.net
Subject: Re: sql can i substitute
In-Reply-To: <0412171822481N.06834@thenilgiris.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox