From: Rod Taylor <rbt@zort.ca>
To: Hackers List <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 23:19:45 -0400
Message-ID: <0a9401c1e4f5$8f2ac5b0$8001a8c0@jester> (raw)
References: <200204160258.g3G2wpG01075@candle.pha.pa.us>
On the note of NAMEDATALEN, a view in the INFORMATION_SCHEMA
definition is exactly 2 characters over the current limit.
ADMINISTRABLE_ROLE_AUTHORIZATIONS
Not that it's a great reason, but it isn't a bad one for increasing
the limit ;)
--
Rod Taylor
> Are we staying at 16 as the default? I personally think we can
> increase it to 32 with little penalty, and that we should increase
> NAMEDATALEN to 64.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: rbt@zort.ca, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit
In-Reply-To: <0a9401c1e4f5$8f2ac5b0$8001a8c0@jester>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox