pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter T. Brown <peter@memeticsystems.com>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: how can I improve the speed of this query
Date: 15 Nov 2002 12:33:29 -0800
Message-ID: <1037392411.2473.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <web-1827592@davinci.ethosmedia.com>
References: <web-1827592@davinci.ethosmedia.com>

Hi--

I have this rather long complex query that takes really long to complete
(please see below). It seems like I ought to improve the speed somehow.
I don't understand, for example, what the query planner is doing when it
says "Hash" and why this appears to take so long. And since I have a key
for Visitor.ID, I don't understand why its doing a sequential scan on
that table... 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated!


Thanks

Peter




EXPLAIN SELECT 
	"Visitor"."Created",
	"Visitor"."Updated",
	"Tidbit"."ID",
	"ProgramEvent"."ID",
	"Visitor"."Email",
	"Interest"."ID",
	"VisitorInternetDeviceAssoc"."ID",
	"Referral"."ID" 

FROM "VisitorExtra" 

LEFT OUTER JOIN Tidbit" ON 
	"VisitorExtra"."ID"="Tidbit"."VisitorID" 

LEFT OUTER JOIN "ProgramEvent" ON
	"VisitorExtra"."ID"="ProgramEvent"."VisitorID" 

LEFT OUTER JOIN "Interest" ON 
	"VisitorExtra"."ID"="Interest"."VisitorID" 

LEFT OUTER JOIN "VisitorInternetDeviceAssoc" ON
	"VisitorExtra"."ID"="VisitorInternetDeviceAssoc"."VisitorID" 

LEFT OUTER JOIN "Referral" ON
	"VisitorExtra"."ID"="Referral"."FromVisitorID","Visitor" 

WHERE "VisitorExtra"."ID"="Visitor"."ID" AND 
	"VisitorExtra"."ID"= 325903;


NOTICE:  QUERY PLAN:

Hash Join  (cost=14584.37..59037.79 rows=57747 width=76)
  ->  Merge Join  (cost=0.00..36732.65 rows=57747 width=44)
        ->  Merge Join  (cost=0.00..29178.16 rows=10681 width=36)
              ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.00..10505.74 rows=6674 width=28)
                    ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.00..435.29 rows=177
			width=20)
                          ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.00..15.70 rows=55
				width=12)
                                ->  Index Scan using VisitorExtra_pkey
				    on VisitorExtra  (cost=0.00..3.01 rows=1 				    width=4)
                                ->  Index Scan using 				   
Tidbit_VisitorID_key on Tidbit  				    (cost=0.00..12.67 rows=2
width=8)
                          ->  Index Scan using 			     	 			     
ProgramEvent_VisitorID_key on ProgramEvent  			      (cost=0.00..7.57
rows=2 width=8)
                    ->  Index Scan using Interest_VisitorID_key on
			Interest  (cost=0.00..56.66 rows=19 width=8)
              ->  Index Scan using VisitorInternetDeviceAssoc_Visi on
		  VisitorInternetDeviceAssoc  (cost=0.00..16402.90 rows=174887 		 
width=8)
        ->  Index Scan using Referral_FromVisitorID_key on Referral 
	    (cost=0.00..6323.41 rows=87806 width=8)
  ->  Hash  (cost=6061.79..6061.79 rows=317379 width=32)
        ->  Seq Scan on Visitor  (cost=0.00..6061.79 rows=317379 	   
width=32)





view thread (2+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1037392411.2473.36.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Permalink:  ../1037392411.2473.36.camel@localhost.localdomain/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1037392411.2473.36.camel@localhost.localdomain

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: peter@memeticsystems.com
  Subject: Re: how can I improve the speed of this query
  In-Reply-To: <1037392411.2473.36.camel@localhost.localdomain>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox