From: Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
To: Richard Huxton <richardh@archonet.com>
Cc: vijaykumar M <m_vijaykumar@hotmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Why their is a limit in Postgresql (psql) Parameters..?
Date: 21 Jul 2003 13:09:18 +0000
Message-ID: <1058792958.30101.20.camel@jester> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200307211242.49263.richardh@archonet.com>
References: <BAY2-F69ACkWHZqYW8B00007b50@hotmail.com>
<200307211242.49263.richardh@archonet.com>
> The reason why it's not bigger is that there hasn't been enough people saying
> "I need more parameters".
That and a general speed penalty to all users of all functions.
Make (whatever) the limitation is affect only those using a large number
of parameters and you will find the limit set to a fairly high number.
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 186B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: rbt@rbt.ca, richardh@archonet.com, m_vijaykumar@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Why their is a limit in Postgresql (psql) Parameters..?
In-Reply-To: <1058792958.30101.20.camel@jester>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox