From: Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
To: Mike Winter <mike.winter@frontlogic.com>
Cc: Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: "SELECT IN" Still Broken in 7.4b
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 17:09:46 +0000
Message-ID: <1061399385.40948.13.camel@jester> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0308201043400.6023-100000@frontlogic.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0308201043400.6023-100000@frontlogic.com>
> Thanks, Stephan. I was really hoping that the IN(valuelist) was going to
> be changed at the same time, because it really is unusable for anything
> over a couple of thousand values.
Changed to do what?
I suppose that the ability to combine several index scans via a bitmap
would help to linearize those, but that is far from an IN(valuelist)
specific enhancement.
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 186B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: rbt@rbt.ca, mike.winter@frontlogic.com, sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com
Subject: Re: "SELECT IN" Still Broken in 7.4b
In-Reply-To: <1061399385.40948.13.camel@jester>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox