From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: mario.splivalo@mobart.hr
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: RETURNS SETOF primitive returns results in parentheses
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 15:45:33 -0400
Message-ID: <10931.1130355933@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1130355699.18653.0.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1130330322.7400.45.camel@ekim>
<5954.1130337622@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<1130355699.18653.0.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mario Splivalo <mario.splivalo@mobart.hr> writes:
> Wo-ha, makes perfect sense. So, I'd go by with declaring the rec as
> varchar, instead as of a record. Wich is what I should do in the first
> place.
Or just return the correct field out of it.
RETURN NEXT returnValue.fieldname;
I think you may have to do it this way because the FOR loop wants a
record variable.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, mario.splivalo@mobart.hr
Subject: Re: RETURNS SETOF primitive returns results in parentheses
In-Reply-To: <10931.1130355933@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox