From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: John Proctor <jproctor@prium.net>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 16 parameter limit
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 18:33:59 -0500
Message-ID: <10982.1018049639@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <web-1050933@davinci.ethosmedia.com>
References: <web-1050933@davinci.ethosmedia.com>
"Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> However, we also want to support users who are porting their PL/SQL
> applications, which may not be easily translated into %rowtype
> paramters.
Well, probably the $64 question there is: what is Oracle's limit on
number of parameters?
> What do you (personally) think about trying to get RH involved in
> expanding PL/pgSQL's capabilites as a way fo targeting Oracle's users
> for RHDB?
Seems like a good idea in the abstract ... but the hard question is what
are you willing to see *not* get done in order to put cycles on plpgsql.
And there's not a large supply of cycles.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, josh@agliodbs.com, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, jproctor@prium.net
Subject: Re: 16 parameter limit
In-Reply-To: <10982.1018049639@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox