pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ross Johnson <ross.johnson@homemail.com.au>
To: PostgreSQL SQL List <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: cross tables, SELECT expressions, and GROUP BY problem
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 18:00:08 +1000
Message-ID: <1143964809.8841.211.camel@desk.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1143960225.8841.187.camel@desk.home>
References: <1143960225.8841.187.camel@desk.home>

On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 16:43 +1000, Ross Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm relatively stretched when it comes to SQL but I'm getting there. I
> have a question though:
> 
> Thanks to various web sites I've succeeded in creating simple cross
> tables in PostgreSQL. I'm now trying more complicated examples
> (migrating queries from MS Access to PostgreSQL). I'm stuck on getting
> grouping to work where the selection element isn't a real table field,
> where it is generated by a CASE statement. Here's a full actual SELECT
> statement, that works but isn't quite what I need, followed by the first
> few rows of output:
> 
> SELECT DISTINCT
> 	CASE
> 		WHEN lower(c."Order") = 'coleoptera' THEN 5
> 		WHEN lower(c."Order") = 'trichoptera' THEN 8
> 		WHEN lower(c."Order") = 'ephemeroptera' THEN 6
> 		WHEN lower(c."Order") = 'plecoptera' THEN 7
> 		WHEN lower(c."Class") = 'oligochaeta' THEN 1
> 		WHEN lower(c."Family") LIKE 'chiron%' THEN 2
> 		WHEN lower(c."Order") = 'diptera' AND lower(c."Family") NOT LIKE 'chiron%' THEN 3
> 		ELSE 4
> 	END AS "Ranking",
> 	CASE
> 		WHEN lower(c."Order") = 'coleoptera' THEN 'Coleoptera'
> 		WHEN lower(c."Order") = 'trichoptera' THEN 'Trichoptera'
> 		WHEN lower(c."Order") = 'ephemeroptera' THEN 'Ephemeroptera'
> 		WHEN lower(c."Order") = 'plecoptera' THEN 'Plecoptera'
> 		WHEN lower(c."Class") = 'oligochaeta' THEN 'Oligochaeta'
> 		WHEN lower(c."Family") LIKE 'chiron%' THEN 'Chironomidae'
> 		WHEN lower(c."Order") = 'diptera' AND lower(c."Family") NOT LIKE 'chiron%' THEN 'Diptera (Other)'
> 		ELSE 'Other'
> 	END AS "Taxa",
> 	SUM(CASE WHEN b."LocationCode" = '2222011' THEN c."Count" END) AS "2222011",
> 	SUM(CASE WHEN b."LocationCode" = '2222012' THEN c."Count" END) AS "2222012",
> 	SUM(CASE WHEN b."LocationCode" = '2222013' THEN c."Count" END) AS "2222013",
> 	SUM(CASE WHEN b."LocationCode" = '2222014' THEN c."Count" END) AS "2222014"
> FROM "tblBugIDSheetInfo" b
> 	INNER JOIN "tblBugCount" c USING ("BugSheetID")
> GROUP BY c."Order", c."Class", c."Family"
> ORDER BY "Ranking"
> 
> Generates the following output:
> 
> Ranking	Taxa			2222011	2222012	2222013	2222014
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 1	"Oligochaeta"		487	1711	1759	1078
> 1	"Oligochaeta"		7			
> 1	"Oligochaeta"					
> 2	"Chironomidae"		1385	2335	1500	1513
> 2	"Chironomidae"					
> 3	"Diptera (Other)"				5
> 3	"Diptera (Other)"		1	1	3
> 3	"Diptera (Other)"	199	19	40	37
> 3	"Diptera (Other)"				
> ...

I should add that I've just tried the following query, which is just a
rearrangement of the above query using a sub-SELECT, and the result is
the same as above apart from a slightly different ordering of the rows.
That is, GROUP BY "Ranking" still doesn't appear to do anything. I was
under the impression that a sub-SELECT creates a temporary, or at least
a pseudo-temporary table (a "virtual" table as it's called in the
documentation), so I would have expected this query to work even if the
above one doesn't.


SELECT DISTINCT
	"Ranking", "Taxa",
	SUM(CASE WHEN b."LocationCode" = '2222011' THEN c."Count" END) AS "2222011",
	SUM(CASE WHEN b."LocationCode" = '2222012' THEN c."Count" END) AS "2222012",
	SUM(CASE WHEN b."LocationCode" = '2222013' THEN c."Count" END) AS "2222013",
	SUM(CASE WHEN b."LocationCode" = '2222014' THEN c."Count" END) AS "2222014"
FROM "tblBugIDSheetInfo" b
	INNER JOIN (
		SELECT "BugSheetID",
		CASE
			WHEN lower("Order") = 'coleoptera' THEN 5
			WHEN lower("Order") = 'trichoptera' THEN 8
			WHEN lower("Order") = 'ephemeroptera' THEN 6
			WHEN lower("Order") = 'plecoptera' THEN 7
			WHEN lower("Class") = 'oligochaeta' THEN 1
			WHEN lower("Family") LIKE 'chiron%' THEN 2
			WHEN lower("Order") = 'diptera' AND lower("Family") NOT LIKE 'chiron%' THEN 3
			ELSE 4
		END AS "Ranking",
		CASE
			WHEN lower("Order") = 'coleoptera' THEN 'Coleoptera'
			WHEN lower("Order") = 'trichoptera' THEN 'Trichoptera'
			WHEN lower("Order") = 'ephemeroptera' THEN 'Ephemeroptera'
			WHEN lower("Order") = 'plecoptera' THEN 'Plecoptera'
			WHEN lower("Class") = 'oligochaeta' THEN 'Oligochaeta'
			WHEN lower("Family") LIKE 'chiron%' THEN 'Chironomidae'
			WHEN lower("Order") = 'diptera' AND lower("Family") NOT LIKE 'chiron%' THEN 'Diptera (Other)'
			ELSE 'Other'
		END AS "Taxa",
		"Order", "Class", "Family", "Count"
		FROM "tblBugCount") c USING ("BugSheetID")
GROUP BY c."Ranking", c."Taxa", c."Order", c."Class", c."Family"
ORDER BY "Ranking"


In the doco, I found this statement:
"In strict SQL, GROUP BY can only group by columns of the source table
but PostgreSQL extends this to also allow GROUP BY to group by columns
in the select list. Grouping by value expressions instead of simple
column names is also allowed."

This seems to relate to what I'm trying to do, and seems to say that it
should be possible, unless I'm misreading it.

Is my only option to create an actual temporary table? I was hoping to
avoid that. If I must, is there a function to generate unique table
names that I can use?

Regards.
Ross Johnson

> I want to GROUP on the "Ranking" field as well so that all rows with the
> same "Ranking" value are SUMmed. That is, I'm trying to achieve the
> following:
> 
> Ranking	Taxa			2222011	2222012	2222013	2222014
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 1	"Oligochaeta"		494	1711	1759	1078
> 2	"Chironomidae"		1385	2335	1500	1513
> 3	"Diptera (Other)"	199	20	41	45
> ...
> 
> I tried including "Ranking" at the head of the GROUP BY list, but it has
> no effect.
> 
> Can anyone show me what I'm doing wrong and/or show me what I need to
> change? I'd rather avoid wrapping the whole query in another SELECT that
> would duplicate this one, assuming that that would work.
> 
> Thanks.
> Ross Johnson
> 
> PS. I just want to acknowledge the very useful web sites that I found
> via google which helped out considerably getting me this far with cross-
> tables. The above query is based on this one:
> 
> http://dev.mysql.com/tech-resources/articles/wizard/print_version.html
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> 




view thread (3+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1143964809.8841.211.camel@desk.home>
Permalink:  ../1143964809.8841.211.camel@desk.home/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1143964809.8841.211.camel@desk.home

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: ross.johnson@homemail.com.au
  Subject: Re: cross tables, SELECT expressions, and GROUP BY problem
  In-Reply-To: <1143964809.8841.211.camel@desk.home>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox