From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>
To: Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma@yahoo.com>
Cc: Jamie Tufnell <diesql@googlemail.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Having difficulty writing a "best-fit" query..
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:34:13 -0500
Message-ID: <116766A9-807A-405E-B772-BE8A8AAA12E7@seespotcode.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <354400.92381.qm@web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <354400.92381.qm@web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
On Oct 16, 2007, at 12:14 , Richard Broersma Jr wrote:
> the only difference was that he was modeling employees and
> skillsets. IIRC, the terminology for
> the improved model was the "full disjuctive" model.
Off chance, might the full disjunction work be relevant here?
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/fulldisjunction/
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: grzm@seespotcode.net, rabroersma@yahoo.com, diesql@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: Having difficulty writing a "best-fit" query..
In-Reply-To: <116766A9-807A-405E-B772-BE8A8AAA12E7@seespotcode.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox