From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Cc: Denis BUCHER <dbucherml@hsolutions.ch>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Problem with return type of function ??? (corrected)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:47:13 -0400
Message-ID: <1189.1256226433@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE07507.5050900@archonet.com>
References: <4AE046E4.8010205@hsolutions.ch>
<29935.1256222015@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<4AE07507.5050900@archonet.com>
Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> plpgsql isn't tremendously good with rowtypes that contain dropped
>> columns.
> I thought that only applied to columns dropped after the function was
> defined. Live and learn.
There are/were some variants that go away if you recreate the function
or start a fresh session (to clear the compiled-function cache). Not
all, unfortunately.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, dev@archonet.com, dbucherml@hsolutions.ch
Subject: Re: Problem with return type of function ??? (corrected)
In-Reply-To: <1189.1256226433@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox