From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Petru Ghita <petrutz@venaver.info>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Date comparison, user defined operators and magic
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:32:03 -0500
Message-ID: <11952.1267241523@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B888CAF.6030101@venaver.info>
References: <4B888CAF.6030101@venaver.info>
Petru Ghita <petrutz@venaver.info> writes:
> Hello everybody, I was missing a comparison operator for DATE so I
> wrote one after a really fast look into the documentation.
Huh?
regression=# \do <
List of operators
Schema | Name | Left arg type | Right arg type | Result type | Description
------------+------+-----------------------------+-----------------------------+-------------+---------------------
...
pg_catalog | < | date | date | boolean | less-than
...
> So I started to wonder how is this possible because after doing the
> first comparison using the < operator I really wasn't expecting any of
> the other operators to work at all. But they did!
They were all there before. I doubt it was using yours even in the <
case, because pg_catalog is normally at the front of the search path.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, petrutz@venaver.info
Subject: Re: Date comparison, user defined operators and magic
In-Reply-To: <11952.1267241523@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox