pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Kaloyan Iliev Iliev <news1@faith.digsys.bg>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Problems with UNION ALL and ORDER BY
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 13:09:42 -0400
Message-ID: <12126.1091466582@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <410E6E42.6030206@faith.digsys.bg>
References: <410E6376.1010404@faith.digsys.bg>
	<10984.1091464511@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<410E6E42.6030206@faith.digsys.bg>

Kaloyan Iliev Iliev <news1@faith.digsys.bg> writes:
> As I say in my previous letter I am using 7.2.3. If you wish I can show 
> you the query and the result to see for yourself, that there is 
> something wrong. It just don't order the overall result but the separate 
> results of the both subqueries.

Quite honestly, I don't believe it.  In 7.2 I get

regression=# explain select * from tenk1 a union all select * from tenk1 b order by unique1;
NOTICE:  QUERY PLAN:

Sort  (cost=3128.28..3128.28 rows=20000 width=148)
  ->  Append  (cost=0.00..760.00 rows=20000 width=148)
        ->  Subquery Scan *SELECT* 1  (cost=0.00..380.00 rows=10000 width=148)
              ->  Seq Scan on tenk1 a  (cost=0.00..380.00 rows=10000 width=148)
        ->  Subquery Scan *SELECT* 2  (cost=0.00..380.00 rows=10000 width=148)
              ->  Seq Scan on tenk1 b  (cost=0.00..380.00 rows=10000 width=148)

EXPLAIN

and as you can see there's only one sort step being applied to the union
result.

Now if EXPLAIN shows you a different sorting structure for your query,
then I'd be interested to see the exact query and the EXPLAIN output.
But what I think is that you are misinterpreting the sorting result you
get.  If you are using a non-C locale you may be seeing some pretty
weird sorting rules :-(

			regards, tom lane



view thread (7+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <12126.1091466582@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../12126.1091466582@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/12126.1091466582@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, news1@faith.digsys.bg
  Subject: Re: Problems with UNION ALL and ORDER BY
  In-Reply-To: <12126.1091466582@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox