pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ivan marchesini <marchesini@unipg.it>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: 2 tables or two db?
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:22:15 +0200
Message-ID: <1245338535.15412.4.camel@ivangeo> (raw)

Dear postgres users,

Suppose I have two tables of data.

suppose the two table are really similar in dimensions 

suppose they will receive the same number and type of queries.

in tems of performance (velocity of answer) it is better to place the
two tables in the same db or into two different db?

may be it is a stupid question, but....

many many thanks...

 Ivan








view thread (2+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1245338535.15412.4.camel@ivangeo>
Permalink:  ../1245338535.15412.4.camel@ivangeo/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1245338535.15412.4.camel@ivangeo

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: marchesini@unipg.it
  Subject: Re: 2 tables or two db?
  In-Reply-To: <1245338535.15412.4.camel@ivangeo>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox