From: rverghese <riyav@hotmail.com>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Concurrent Reindex on Primary Key for large table
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 09:48:53 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1328809733573-5470216.post@n5.nabble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jgueru$2vk$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <1328724449781-5467243.post@n5.nabble.com>
<jgueru$2vk$1@dough.gmane.org>
Thanks! That worked.
Any thoughts about containing index bloat. I thought the autovac would clean
it up a bit more. Would any tweaks to my settings improve autovac
performance? I am still doing a couple of concurrent reindexes per week
otherwise performance degrades over a couple of days.
Thanks
RV
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Concurrent-Reindex-on-Primary-Key-for-large-table-tp5467243p...
Sent from the PostgreSQL - sql mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: riyav@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Concurrent Reindex on Primary Key for large table
In-Reply-To: <1328809733573-5470216.post@n5.nabble.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox