From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Achilleus Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
Cc: Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>
Cc: Riccardo G. Facchini <abief_ag_-postgresql@yahoo.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org, Theodore Petrosky <tedpet5@yahoo.com>
Cc: Andrei Bintintan <klodoma@ar-sd.net>
Cc: sad <sad@bankir.ru>
Subject: Re: A transaction in transaction? Possible?
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:28:17 -0500
Message-ID: <13824.1100107697@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0411101256590.6883-100000@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0411101256590.6883-100000@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
Achilleus Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> writes:
> Just a very naive thought....
> Wouldn't make more sense to allow nested begin/commit/rollback blocks?
We actually had it working that way initially, but changed to the
spec-defined behavior, because (a) it wasn't standard, and (b) it
was confusing. See the pghackers archives.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com, mike@fuhr.org, abief_ag_-postgresql@yahoo.com, tedpet5@yahoo.com, klodoma@ar-sd.net, sad@bankir.ru
Subject: Re: A transaction in transaction? Possible?
In-Reply-To: <13824.1100107697@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox