From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Martin Edlman <edlman@fortech.cz>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Pg Docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Cc: andrew@dunslane.net
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [SQL] pl/PgSQL, variable names in NEW
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:45:25 -0400
Message-ID: <1413.1207838725@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080410131602.GF4697@alvh.no-ip.org>
References: <47FA034B.7090201@fortech.cz>
<162867790804070511y7266c911w370db97a78c3c519@mail.gmail.com>
<47FB51C7.6090509@fortech.cz>
<20080408132157.GF5290@alvh.no-ip.org>
<47FDFB2E.3060503@fortech.cz>
<20080410131602.GF4697@alvh.no-ip.org>
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Question for plperl hackers: Should we remove the mention of DBD::PgSPI
> from the PL/Perl manual?
It seems like a reasonable suggestion to me, since perl database users
probably already know DBD and don't have to learn something new if they
go that way.
Possibly the text should be reworded, with the mention of DBD::PgSPI put
somewhere else or stuck into a <note> or something.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, alvherre@commandprompt.com, edlman@fortech.cz, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, andrew@dunslane.net
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [SQL] pl/PgSQL, variable names in NEW
In-Reply-To: <1413.1207838725@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox