From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Glaesemann <grzm@myrealbox.com>
Cc: Pedro B. <pedro.borracha@netcabo.pt>
Cc: Achilleus Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Datetime
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 18:55:08 -0400
Message-ID: <14757.1091573708@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BD0DA1B6-E59A-11D8-8966-000A95C88220@myrealbox.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408031449340.7249-100000@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
<B161AE30-E550-11D8-8966-000A95C88220@myrealbox.com>
<23178.1091546009@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<BD0DA1B6-E59A-11D8-8966-000A95C88220@myrealbox.com>
Michael Glaesemann <grzm@myrealbox.com> writes:
> I don't quite understand how I am wrong in saying that PostgreSQL does
> not use UNIX epoch timestamps internally, as you've clearly explained
> it doesn't.
We are talking at cross-purposes. I thought you were suggesting that PG
doesn't use a seconds-from-epoch form at all, but some other format
(such as perhaps separate yyyy/mm/dd/hh/mm/ss fields). Sorry if I added
to the confusion instead of dispelling it.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, grzm@myrealbox.com, pedro.borracha@netcabo.pt, achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com
Subject: Re: Datetime
In-Reply-To: <14757.1091573708@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox