pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Lew <lew@nospam.lewscanon.com>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Against legal disclaimers in email
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 14:33:12 -0400
Message-ID: <15024.1179599592@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <of-dnQXcNrbjAtDbnZ2dnUVZ_t6qnZ2d@comcast.com>
References: <A70AE049E81A6A40879D5DC0AC8C38C908CD9133@venus.infics.com>
	<463E67EF.5080905@herakles.homelinux.org>
	<of-dnQXcNrbjAtDbnZ2dnUVZ_t6qnZ2d@comcast.com>

[ redirected for a wider audience ]

Lew <lew@nospam.lewscanon.com> writes:
> John Summerfield wrote:
>> Penchalaiah P. wrote:
>>> Information transmitted by this e-mail is proprietary to Infinite 
>>> Computer Solutions 
>> 
>> It may be proprietary, but it shore ain't confidential!

> Placing "confidential" on every document without regard for its
> content, especially when some of it's publicly disseminated, can
> remove the protection of confidentiality at law from all such marked
> documents in many jurisdictions, including the U.S.  There must be
> discrimination applied in the marking of information as
> "confidential".

> Quite aside from the foolishness you pointed out of marking something
> "confidential" then placing it into the public eye in an archived
> forum where it will be visible by everybody forever.

> Now we can publish everything ever written at or by Infinite Computer 
> Solutions without fear of liability.

Wow, that is a great argument that I've not seen before.  The only
way we'll ever make a dent in the plague of legalistic disclaimers
auto-attached to email is if we can convince corporate lawyers that
there is a downside *to them* of insisting on the damned things.
This is the first argument I've seen that there might actually be
a serious legal downside to the practice.

Can you cite chapter and verse to back up this position?  It'd be
great to have a well-reasoned FAQ document that people could just
automatically send to anyone exhibiting this folly ...

			regards, tom lane



Message-ID: <15024.1179599592@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../15024.1179599592@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/15024.1179599592@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, lew@nospam.lewscanon.com, pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org
  Subject: Re: Against legal disclaimers in email
  In-Reply-To: <15024.1179599592@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox