From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL SQL List <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Aggregates with internal state type?
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:25:17 -0400
Message-ID: <17004.1158182717@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <450875FC.9040907@logix-tt.com>
References: <45086B40.3000200@logix-tt.com>
<16722.1158181987@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<450875FC.9040907@logix-tt.com>
Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com> writes:
> Ah, I see. So there's no possibility to pass some void* kind of
> intermediate data, I have to craft at least a dummy PostgreSQL datatype
> for it.
Right. My first thought would be to use bytea as the declared type ---
doesn't put much burden on you except to have a length word at the front.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, schabi@logix-tt.com
Subject: Re: Aggregates with internal state type?
In-Reply-To: <17004.1158182717@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox