From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Cc: magnus.enbom@rockstorm.se, Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [SQL] LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1?
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 00:29:16 -0400
Message-ID: <17588.1030508956@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200208280245.g7S2jO803463@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <200208280245.g7S2jO803463@candle.pha.pa.us>
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> OK, patch attached. It was actually easier than I thought. We have to
> decide if we are going to remove the old syntax in 7.4.
I'd say "no". There's no compelling reason to break backward
compatibility here --- certainly a couple more productions in gram.y
isn't enough reason.
But I think it'd be sufficient to document only the new syntax.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, chriskl@familyhealth.com.au, JanWieck@Yahoo.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1?
In-Reply-To: <17588.1030508956@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox