pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Achilleus Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
Cc: Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] [PERFORM] 7.3.1 index use / performance
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 13:39:57 -0500
Message-ID: <19585.1041964797@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301072034050.9687-100000@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301072034050.9687-100000@matrix.gatewaynet.com>

Achilleus Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> writes:
> My case persists:
> After clean install of the database, and after vacuum analyze,
> i get

Um ... is it persisting?  That looks like it's correctly picked the
vcode index this time.  Strange behavior though.  By "clean install"
do you mean you rebuilt Postgres, or just did dropdb/createdb/reload
data?

			regards, tom lane



view thread (15+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <19585.1041964797@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../19585.1041964797@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/19585.1041964797@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com, sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [SQL] [PERFORM] 7.3.1 index use / performance
  In-Reply-To: <19585.1041964797@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox