From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Wei Weng <wweng@kencast.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Which one is faster?
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 16:34:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <200206192034.g5JKYn616099@candle.pha.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1024514821.20296.5.camel@Monet>
Wei Weng wrote:
> Between Using Limit P, S or using a cursor to start from FETCH ABSOLUTE
> S and FETCH NEXT for P times, which one is faster?
LIMIT is faster because it doesn't need to generate all the result, in
some cases.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, wweng@kencast.com
Subject: Re: Which one is faster?
In-Reply-To: <200206192034.g5JKYn616099@candle.pha.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox