pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Adam Erickson <adamre@cox.net>
Cc: pgsql-novice@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Aggregates and Indexes
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 20:43:30 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <200208040043.g740hUN13489@candle.pha.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <web-1599490@davinci.ethosmedia.com>


Oh, sure I understand.  There were a number of people mentioning the
core issue.  What the core/major folks do is more give information about
historical or practical ideas behind certain issues, so in that way they
do have a strong voice, but only in the way their ideas effect other
people's opinions and votes.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
> 
> > I have seen a few mentions in the past weeks about core vs. non-core
> > developers.  I should reiterate that the core group feels there is no
> > distinction between the opinions of the core people and the other
> > major
> > developers.  Everyone gets just one vote.
> 
> Which is why it's important that us peripheral developers make sure you
> get the respect you deserve, since you're so un-assertive. <grin>
> 
> Why I often make a comment like that in my messages is that, as a
> strictly *documentation* contributor, I often make mistaken assumptions
> about why some things in Postgres work the way they do.   Heck, even
> when I'm right, I'm usually just parroting something you, Tom, or
> Stephan have told me.
> 
> Or, to put it another way:  given the number of questions I field on
> this list, and the stuff I write for Techdocs and elsewhere, there is a
> tendency from the public to assume that I am a "big wheel" in the
> PostgreSQL project.   Which I am not.   I've been here for a while,
> yes, but by no means do my contributions equal in scope, importance, or
> dedication the contributions of you, Tom, Stephan, Peter, Thomas, Joe,
> or two dozen other contributors whose names don't spring immediately to
> mind.    
> 
> Further, I do not consult with the PostgreSQL "global development team"
> before mouthing off; my opinions are mine, not those of the postgresql
> project.
> 
> Thus, the comment in so many of my e-mails of "I am not a core
> developer."
> 
> Capisce?
> 
> -Josh Berkus
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026



view thread (7+ messages)

Message-ID: <200208040043.g740hUN13489@candle.pha.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../200208040043.g740hUN13489@candle.pha.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/200208040043.g740hUN13489@candle.pha.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, josh@agliodbs.com, adamre@cox.net, pgsql-novice@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [SQL] Aggregates and Indexes
  In-Reply-To: <200208040043.g740hUN13489@candle.pha.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox