pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at>
Cc: Roland Roberts <roland@astrofoto.org>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:10:07 +1000
Message-ID: <20020929041007.GB6199@svana.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200209290351.g8T3pW920188@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <20020929034706.GA6199@svana.org>
	<200209290351.g8T3pW920188@candle.pha.pa.us>

On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 11:51:32PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > Well, I'd rather it didn't change at all. IMHO it's a feature, not a bug. In
> > any case, if it does get changed we'll have to go through the documentation
> > and work out whether we mean current_timestamp or now(). I think most people
> > actually want now().
> 
> Well, I think we have to offer statement start time somewhere, and it
> seems the standard probably requires that.  Two other databases do it
> that way.  Oracle doesn't have CURRENT_TIMESTAMP in 8.X.  Can anyone
> test on 9.X?

Hmm, well having a statement start time could be conceivably useful.

> > Fortunatly where I work we only use now() so it won't really matter too
> > much. Is there a compelling reason to change?
> 
> Yes, it will split now() and CURRENT_TIMESTAMP.  I personally would be
> happy with STATEMENT_TIMESTAMP, but because the standard requires it we
> may just have to fix CURRENT_TIMESTAMP.

Well, my vote would be for STATEMENT_TIMESTAMP. Is there really no other
database that does it the way we do? Perhaps it could be matched with a
TRANSACTION_TIMESTAMP and we can sort out CURRENT_TIMESTAMP some other way.

-- 
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those that can do binary
> arithmetic and those that can't.



view thread (61+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20020929041007.GB6199@svana.org>
Permalink:  ../20020929041007.GB6199@svana.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20020929041007.GB6199@svana.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: kleptog@svana.org, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, mkoi-pg@aon.at, roland@astrofoto.org, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
  In-Reply-To: <20020929041007.GB6199@svana.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox