From: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
To: Keith Gray <keith@heart.com.au>
Cc: PostgreSQL Mailing List <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Slow performance on MAX(primary_key)
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 09:26:52 +0000
Message-ID: <200210170926.53170.dev@archonet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DAE0883.6090709@heart.com.au>
References: <20021015071628.57518.qmail@web80304.mail.yahoo.com>
<200210150923.15822.dev@archonet.com>
<3DAE0883.6090709@heart.com.au>
On Thursday 17 Oct 2002 12:46 am, Keith Gray wrote:
> Getting MIN() adn MAX() seems fairly trivial to me.
>
> When is on an index or more importantly Primary
> Key it must be a common SQL.
>
> Would it be possible in the code to look at
> the field in MIN() or MAX() and if it is
> indexed use a similar method to the suggested
> SQL work around?
>
> Can I help this to happen?
Subscribe to pgsql-hackers and talk through a proposed hack there. The
developers always seem happy to receive contributions (you've just got to
look at the contrib folder for evidence).
--
Richard Huxton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: dev@archonet.com, keith@heart.com.au
Subject: Re: Slow performance on MAX(primary_key)
In-Reply-To: <200210170926.53170.dev@archonet.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox