From: Denis Zaitsev <zzz@cd-club.ru>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Are scalar type's in/out functions implicitly STRICT?
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 05:41:47 +0500
Message-ID: <20030302054147.B30850@natasha.zzz.zzz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030228032444.GA4648@wolff.to>
References: <20030228054544.A4208@natasha.zzz.zzz>
<20030228032444.GA4648@wolff.to>
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 09:24:44PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 05:45:44 +0500,
> Denis Zaitsev <zzz@cd-club.ru> wrote:
> > So, I create some new scalar type and I don't declare its in/out
> > functions as STRICT. But PostgreSQL copes with them such as they
> > would be STRICT - they never get the NULL value. And this is not
> > documented, AFAIK. Have I missed something or is it a some hard
> > well-known etc. fact? Thanks in advance.
>
> Are you using the version one calling sequence?
Yes, I am - v1.
> The version zero method doesn't have a way handle nulls other than by
> declaring the function strict.
>
Hmm, examples/docs show such a way for v0...
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: zzz@cd-club.ru
Subject: Re: Are scalar type's in/out functions implicitly STRICT?
In-Reply-To: <20030302054147.B30850@natasha.zzz.zzz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox