From: Denis Zaitsev <zzz@cd-club.ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: default operator class (PostgreSQL's error?)
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:03:52 +0500
Message-ID: <20030303100352.D4208@natasha.zzz.zzz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18747.1046628100@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <20030302142401.B4208@natasha.zzz.zzz>
<18747.1046628100@sss.pgh.pa.us>
I've found a reason! It's some namespace problem - there are other
tho name_ops operator classes exist. My becomes third. All are the
default for (their) type. And somewhere there is the issue. Renaming
my operator class into, say, name_t_ops resolves the problem.
Thanks for the info.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: zzz@cd-club.ru, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: default operator class (PostgreSQL's error?)
In-Reply-To: <20030303100352.D4208@natasha.zzz.zzz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox