From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
To: Matt Mello <alien@spaceship.com>
Cc: jasiek@klaster.net
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: implied FROM
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 11:04:30 -0500
Message-ID: <20030502160430.GB24597@wolff.to> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59964.24.243.219.116.1051883093.squirrel@earth.spaceship.com>
References: <3EB21AE6.4020205@klaster.net>
<59964.24.243.219.116.1051883093.squirrel@earth.spaceship.com>
On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 08:44:53 -0500,
Matt Mello <alien@spaceship.com> wrote:
> Tomasz Myrta said:
> > <cut>
> > Some people
> > said, that it is very useful inside update queries. The conclusion was
> > this behaviour should stay as it is.
>
> I see. I would have to disagree with those people.
The problem is that there is currently no way to do this on delete
statements without having the tables joined automagically.
There was some talk going on in another thread in the last couple of days
of adding a GUC setting to force an error instead of a warning in this
case.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: bruno@wolff.to, alien@spaceship.com, jasiek@klaster.net
Subject: Re: implied FROM
In-Reply-To: <20030502160430.GB24597@wolff.to>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox