From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
To: greg@turnstep.com
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: obtuse plpgsql function needs
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:11:36 -0700
Message-ID: <200307231311.36341.josh@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1058990513.22260.698.camel@camel>
References: <69939b465aaab0cbd79000ce42891f58@biglumber.com>
<1058990513.22260.698.camel@camel>
Robert,
> 2) would it be faster in pltcl? seems like it would if i didn't have to
> do the catalog lookups, but is pltcl inherently faster anyways?
Probably, yes. Execution of dynamic query strings in PL/pgSQL tends to be
pretty slow.
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, xzilla@users.sourceforge.net, greg@turnstep.com
Subject: Re: obtuse plpgsql function needs
In-Reply-To: <200307231311.36341.josh@agliodbs.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox