From: Bertrand Petit <pgsql-sql@phoe.frmug.org>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: "SELECT IN" Still Broken in 7.4b
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 08:32:32 +0200
Message-ID: <20030822083232.C81672@memo.frmug.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18608.1061411539@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0308201247550.6023-100000@frontlogic.com>
<18608.1061411539@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 04:32:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> against actual elapsed time (cf psql's \timing option) would tell.
What is measured by the \timing option? The figures reported
are slightly larger than those loged when the log_duration parameter
is true.
=> select count(*) from foo;
count
--------
362921
(1 row)
Time: 5500.88 ms
while in syslog, the timing was "LOG: duration: 5.499783 sec". There
is a difference of 1.097 ms.
In both cases what is this duration? Real time or CPU time?
--
%!PS
297.6 420.9 translate 90 rotate 0 setgray gsave 0 1 1{pop 0 180 moveto 100
180 170 100 170 -10 curveto 180 -9 180 -9 190 -10 curveto 190 100 100 180
0 180 curveto fill 180 rotate}for grestore/Bookman-LightItalic findfont
240 scalefont setfont -151.536392 -63.7998886 moveto (bp)show showpage
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-sql@phoe.frmug.org
Subject: Re: "SELECT IN" Still Broken in 7.4b
In-Reply-To: <20030822083232.C81672@memo.frmug.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox