From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
To: John B. Scalia <jscalia@cityblueprinting.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Bug in psql - Postgresql 7.3.1?
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 14:47:16 -0500
Message-ID: <20031003194716.GB23110@wolff.to> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001a01c389b0$e00773a0$2501a8c0@John>
References: <001a01c389b0$e00773a0$2501a8c0@John>
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:18:44 -0400,
"John B. Scalia" <jscalia@cityblueprinting.com> wrote:
> All,
>
>
>
> I'm not certain if what I'm trying to do is legal, but if I execute a
> statement like:
>
>
>
> UPDATE my_table SET field1='new_value' AND SET field2='different_value'
> WHERE my_table_id = 'key';
It should be:
UPDATE my_table SET field1='new_value', field2='different_value'
WHERE my_table_id = 'key';
> in psql, it reports that it has successfully updated one record.
I am not sure why you aren't getting a syntax error.
> However, the record does not appear to be updated when I subsequently
> issue a SELECT for that record. I'll buy the fact that I may be using
> illegal syntax - I'm not SQL expert, but the update says it worked when
> in fact it did not. Should this have worked or should it have reported
> an error?
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: bruno@wolff.to, jscalia@cityblueprinting.com
Subject: Re: Bug in psql - Postgresql 7.3.1?
In-Reply-To: <20031003194716.GB23110@wolff.to>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox