From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Michael Glaesmann <grzm@myrealbox.com>
To: pgsql-sql <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Functional index problems. (Was: Many joins: monthly summaries S-L--O--W)
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 17:55:29 -0700
Message-ID: <200310221755.13446.josh@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <704FD876-04F0-11D8-81AE-0005029FC1A7@myrealbox.com>
References: <704FD876-04F0-11D8-81AE-0005029FC1A7@myrealbox.com>
Michael,
> My final thought would be to continue using "functional index", noting
> that operators are a special class of function. Out of the above
> description of "value expression", I believe only functions and
> operators are allowed as expressions in the CREATE INDEX syntax,
> correct? (Besides referring to a column.)
Well argued. The problem is Peter's point, which you weren't cc'd on:
>At least it's better than "functional index", because I had always
>wondered where the dysfunctional indexes went. :)
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, grzm@myrealbox.com
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Functional index problems. (Was: Many joins: monthly summaries S-L--O--W)
In-Reply-To: <200310221755.13446.josh@agliodbs.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox