pg.ddx.io pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedisolation level
3+ messages / 3 participants
[nested] [flat]
* isolation level
@ 2004-05-13 18:13 Jaime Casanova <el_vigia_ec@hotmail.com>
2004-05-13 18:24 ` Re: isolation level Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jaime Casanova @ 2004-05-13 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-sql
Hi all, is there a way to set the isolation level to something like the sql
standard dirty read.
Thanx in advance,
Jaime Casanova
_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: isolation level
2004-05-13 18:13 isolation level Jaime Casanova <el_vigia_ec@hotmail.com>
@ 2004-05-13 18:24 ` Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
2004-05-14 05:26 ` Re: isolation level Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bruno Wolff III @ 2004-05-13 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaime Casanova <el_vigia_ec@hotmail.com>; +Cc: pgsql-sql
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 18:13:23 +0000,
Jaime Casanova <el_vigia_ec@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all, is there a way to set the isolation level to something like the
> sql standard dirty read.
No. There will be a way to use the standard name in a SET command, but
you will actaully get READ COMMITTED isolation (which is the next step up).
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: isolation level
2004-05-13 18:13 isolation level Jaime Casanova <el_vigia_ec@hotmail.com>
2004-05-13 18:24 ` Re: isolation level Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
@ 2004-05-14 05:26 ` Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg Stark @ 2004-05-14 05:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>; +Cc: Jaime Casanova <el_vigia_ec@hotmail.com>; pgsql-sql
Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> writes:
> On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 18:13:23 +0000,
> Jaime Casanova <el_vigia_ec@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all, is there a way to set the isolation level to something like the
> > sql standard dirty read.
>
> No. There will be a way to use the standard name in a SET command, but
> you will actaully get READ COMMITTED isolation (which is the next step up).
I wonder how hard this would be to implement. It doesn't seem like it should
be very hard.
It would be very convenient for debugging and for checking on the progress of
large batch updates or loads.
--
greg
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-05-14 05:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-05-13 18:13 isolation level Jaime Casanova <el_vigia_ec@hotmail.com>
2004-05-13 18:24 ` Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
2004-05-14 05:26 ` Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox