From: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <el_vigia_ec@hotmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: isolation level
Date: 14 May 2004 01:26:09 -0400
Message-ID: <87r7tnpojy.fsf@stark.xeocode.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040513182450.GA23159@wolff.to>
References: <BAY8-F126ySsxVY60mJ00019d31@hotmail.com>
<20040513182450.GA23159@wolff.to>
Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> writes:
> On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 18:13:23 +0000,
> Jaime Casanova <el_vigia_ec@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all, is there a way to set the isolation level to something like the
> > sql standard dirty read.
>
> No. There will be a way to use the standard name in a SET command, but
> you will actaully get READ COMMITTED isolation (which is the next step up).
I wonder how hard this would be to implement. It doesn't seem like it should
be very hard.
It would be very convenient for debugging and for checking on the progress of
large batch updates or loads.
--
greg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: gsstark@mit.edu, bruno@wolff.to, el_vigia_ec@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: isolation level
In-Reply-To: <87r7tnpojy.fsf@stark.xeocode.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox