From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: elein <elein@varlena.com>
Cc: postgresql advocacy <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 16:09:51 -0700
Message-ID: <200406031609.51415.josh@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040603134144.X11485@cookie.varlena.com>
References: <200403302050.12415.josh@agliodbs.com>
<20040603184526.GK32598@nibiru.metux.de>
<20040603134144.X11485@cookie.varlena.com>
Elein,
> A typed table is an type which happens to be
> a table. They are also known as composite types
> or row types.
Well, Tom was working on this for spec compliance. I don't know if he
completed it.
Of course, it doesn't answer the two corrolary questions:
1) Why would one want a typed table?
2) Aren't typed tables a big violation of relational database design?
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, elein@varlena.com, pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions
In-Reply-To: <200406031609.51415.josh@agliodbs.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox