pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>
To: Markus Bertheau <twanger@bluetwanger.de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: multi column foreign key for implicitly unique columns
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 08:06:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20040817080425.U61699@megazone.bigpanda.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1092754658.2627.32.camel@dicaprio.akademie1.de>
References: <1092734724.2627.4.camel@dicaprio.akademie1.de>
	<4121D55D.1040105@archonet.com>
	<20040817072443.S60684@megazone.bigpanda.com>
	<4307.1092753995@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<1092754658.2627.32.camel@dicaprio.akademie1.de>

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Markus Bertheau wrote:

> В Втр, 17.08.2004, в 16:46, Tom Lane пишет:
>
> > I think one reason for this is that otherwise it's not clear which
> > unique constraint the FK constraint depends on.  Consider
> >
> > 	create table a (f1 int unique, f2 int unique);
> >
> > 	create table b (f1 int, f2 int,
> > 			foreign key (f1,f2) references a(f1,f2));
> >
> > How would you decide which constraint to make the FK depend on?
>
> Either way, the semantics are the same, right?

Unfortunately, not in the case of dropping the chosen constraint.

Theoretically in that case, you'd probably have to extend the spec there
as well to say that you check any dependent objects again to see if they
would still be valid rather than dropping them (on cascade) or erroring
(on restrict).



view thread (38+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20040817080425.U61699@megazone.bigpanda.com>
Permalink:  ../20040817080425.U61699@megazone.bigpanda.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20040817080425.U61699@megazone.bigpanda.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com, twanger@bluetwanger.de, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, dev@archonet.com
  Subject: Re: multi column foreign key for implicitly unique columns
  In-Reply-To: <20040817080425.U61699@megazone.bigpanda.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox