From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SQL Challenge: Arbitrary Cross-tab
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20040817202141.W84557@megazone.bigpanda.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408171955.11850.josh@agliodbs.com>
References: <200408171955.11850.josh@agliodbs.com>
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:
> I have a wierd business case. Annoyingly it has to be written in *portable*
> SQL92, which means no arrays or custom aggregates. I think it may be
> impossible to do in SQL which is why I thought I'd give the people on this
> list a crack at it. Solver gets a free drink/lunch on me if we ever meet at
> a convention.
>
> The Problem: for each "case" there are from zero to eight "timekeepers"
> authorized to work on the "case", out of a pool of 150 "timekeepers". This
> data is stored vertically:
>
> authorized_timekeepers:
> case_id | timekeeper_id
> 213447 | 047
> 132113 | 021
> 132113 | 115
> 132113 | 106
> etc.
>
> But, a client's e-billing application wants to see these timekeepers displayed
> in the following horizontal format:
>
> case_id | tk1 | tk2 | tk3 | tk4 | tk5 | tk6 | tk7 | tk8
> 213447 | 047 | | | | | | | |
> 132113 | 021 | 115 | 106 | 034 | 109 | 112 | 087 |
> etc.
>
> Order does not matter for timekeepers 1-8.
>
> This is a daunting problem because traditional crosstab solutions do not work;
> timekeepers 1-8 are coming out of a pool of 150.
>
> Can it be done? Or are we going to build this with a row-by-row procedural
If you know it's max 8, I think it may be possible, but I can't think of a
way that'd be better than just writing code yourself.
Just maybe something like the following would give you three timekeepers:
select foo.case_id, foo.v1, foo.v2, (select min(timekeeper_id) from
authorized_timekeepers where
authorized_timekeepers.case_id=foo.case_id and timekeeper_id > foo.v2) as
v3 from (
select foo.case_id, foo.v1, (select min(timekeeper_id) from
authorized_timekeepers where
authorized_timekeepers.case_id=foo.case_id and timekeeper_id > foo.v1) as
v2
from
(select foo.case_id, foo.v1 from
(select foo.case_id,
(select min(timekeeper_id) from authorized_timekeepers where
authorized_timekeepers.case_id=foo.case_id) as v1
from (select distinct case_id from authorized_timekeepers) foo
) foo) foo) foo;
If that works for 3 (and I think that's standard behavior), then you
should be able to extend it to any fixed number using the pattern.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com, josh@agliodbs.com
Subject: Re: SQL Challenge: Arbitrary Cross-tab
In-Reply-To: <20040817202141.W84557@megazone.bigpanda.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox